Maker —
No US authorization
Decision—Studies450Trials49
Profhilo — no US marketing authorization found
Maker — · Injectables · Hyaluronic acid filler
No US authorization
PathwayPathwayThe FDA device, PMA and drug records were searched for this brand and for its manufacturer, and no record carries it. This is a checked absence, not an unchecked one: the queries that were run are listed on the product's page. It is a statement about the US record on the run date. It is not a safety finding, and it says nothing about the product's status in any other country.
Methodology →No US authorization
Methodology →No US authorization
ClassClassNo US record carries this brand, so there is no product code to read a device class from.
Methodology →—
Methodology →—
First decision—
Years on marketYears on marketDerived: the data run date minus the first matched FDA decision date. Arithmetic on a real date, nothing else.
Methodology →—
Methodology →—
StudiesStudiesPubMed records for a fixed query about the MODALITY, not the brand. It measures how much has been published about a technique. It is not a quality score, not an efficacy measure, not a count of randomised trials, and not comparable between modalities of different ages. It says nothing about this brand specifically.
Methodology →1,298
Methodology →1,298
TrialsTrialsClinicalTrials.gov studies for a fixed query about the MODALITY, not the brand. Registration is not completion, not publication and not a result. Counts include studies of any status, size or sponsor, and the recruiting figure is a snapshot taken on the run date. Device studies are under-registered relative to drug studies.
Methodology →46
Methodology →46
No US authorization found — the records were searched, not left unchecked. What this measuresThe FDA device, PMA and drug records were searched for this brand and for its manufacturer, and no record carries it. This is a checked absence, not an unchecked one: the queries that were run are listed on the product's page. It is a statement about the US record on the run date. It is not a safety finding, and it says nothing about the product's status in any other country. It measures how much has been published about a technique. It is not a quality score, not an efficacy measure, not a count of randomised trials, and not comparable between modalities of different ages. It says nothing about this brand specifically.
Methodology →
Compare with similar
Belotero Balance
Belotero Intense (+) Lidocaine
Belotero Volume (+) Lidocaine
Compare all 4 →
Shares treatment areas — not a recommendation. What this measuresPicked mechanically, by rule and nothing else: products in the same Index category that share the most derived treatment areas with this one, ties broken alphabetically. Treatment areas are themselves derived by a published keyword rule run over a real source string, not copied from the cleared or approved indication, so a shared area means two products' source strings happened to use the same word. It does not mean the two products do the same job, it is not a claim that they are interchangeable, and it is not a recommendation.
Methodology →
Comparisons
Profhilo vs hyaluronic acid filler
Overview
- Modality
- Hyaluronic acid filler
- Manufacturer
- —
- Category
- Injectables
- Latest decision
- —
- FDA records
- —
- Mapping
- Not verified
Mapping is the weakest link on this page; the rule is published. What this measuresSearched openFDA for a PMA or 510(k) record under this trade name and under the manufacturer's name; both trade-name searches returned NOT_FOUND and the applicant searches returned only unrelated IBSA products (viscosupplements, a hydrocolloid dressing). No US regulatory number is assigned. Absence of a record here is not proof of anything beyond: openFDA has no matching record on the run date. Re-checked on the current run date: the 510(k), PMA and drug-label searches still return zero results, so this is a checked absence rather than an unmatched crosswalk. A mapping is the weakest link on this page: if it is wrong, every number above it is about the wrong product. It is stated in full so it can be checked.
Methodology →
Regulatory
No US authorization
No clearance number, approval number, device class or decision date is shown, because the FDA device, PMA and drug records were searched for this brand and for its manufacturer and none of them carries it. The queries that were run are listed under Sources on this page, so the absence can be re-checked rather than taken on trust. This describes the US public record on the run date. It is not a safety finding, and the product may be authorised in other countries.
US indication: none shown, because no US record carries this brand, so FDA has assessed no indication for it. US indicationThe FDA device, PMA and drug records were searched for this brand and for its manufacturer, and no record carries it. This is a checked absence, not an unchecked one: the queries that were run are listed on the product's page. It is a statement about the US record on the run date. It is not a safety finding, and it says nothing about the product's status in any other country.
Methodology →
Evidence
Counted for the modality, never the brand.
1,298PubMed, all time
1,033PubMed, 10y
46Studies
3Recruiting
| Hyaluronic acid filler | |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 44 |
| 2017 | 55 |
| 2018 | 64 |
| 2019 | 80 |
| 2020 | 110 |
| 2021 | 119 |
| 2022 | 114 |
| 2023 | 128 |
| 2024 | 164 |
| 2025 | 196 |
| 2026 | 120 |
196papers · 2025 · modality, not brand+20%
PubMed counts publications; ClinicalTrials.gov counts registrations. Neither is a quality score. What this measuresPubMed record counts and ClinicalTrials.gov study counts for a fixed query about the MODALITY, never the brand. It measures how much has been published about a technique. It is not a quality score, not an efficacy measure, not a count of randomised trials, and not comparable between modalities of different ages. It says nothing about this brand specifically. Registration is not completion, not publication and not a result. Counts include studies of any status, size or sponsor, and the recruiting figure is a snapshot taken on the run date. Device studies are under-registered relative to drug studies. The same counts apply to every other product in the Index on this modality: Belotero Balance, Belotero Intense (+) Lidocaine, Belotero Volume (+) Lidocaine, Juvederm Ultra XC, Juvederm Volbella XC, Juvederm Vollure XC, Juvederm Voluma XC, Juvederm Volux XC, RHA Collection, Restylane Defyne, Restylane Kysse, Restylane Lyft, Restylane Silk, Revanesse Versa, SKINVIVE by Juvederm. The trend line is the same fixed modality query windowed per publication year. Number of PubMed records matching each modality's fixed, hand-written title/abstract query, windowed to a single publication year. It measures publication volume about a TECHNIQUE, not a brand. It is NOT a quality score, NOT an efficacy measure, and NOT a count of randomised trials. 2026 is a partial year (run date 2026-07-26); its bar is short because the year is short, not because interest fell. 2026 contains only papers indexed by the run date (2026-07-26). Render it visually distinct (e.g. hollow/hatched) or annotate it; never let it read as a decline.
Methodology →
PubMed query, verbatim
("hyaluronic acid filler"[tiab] OR "hyaluronic acid dermal filler"[tiab] OR ("hyaluronic acid"[tiab] AND ("dermal filler"[tiab] OR "soft tissue filler"[tiab] OR "nasolabial"[tiab] OR "lip augmentation"[tiab] OR "midface"[tiab]))) AND (aesthetic[tiab] OR cosmetic[tiab] OR facial[tiab] OR skin[tiab] OR volume[tiab])
ClinicalTrials.gov query, verbatim
intervention: ("hyaluronic acid filler" OR "hyaluronic acid dermal filler" OR "HA filler") condition: ("nasolabial folds" OR "facial wrinkles" OR "lip augmentation" OR "volume deficit" OR cosmetic)
Treatment areas
What matched, and where
| Area | Matched term | Source string |
|---|---|---|
| Wrinkles & lines | wrinkle | ClinicalTrials.gov condition query for Hyaluronic acid filler |
| Volume & folds | nasolabial fold | ClinicalTrials.gov condition query for Hyaluronic acid filler |
Derived by keyword rule, not the cleared or approved indication. What this measuresTreatment areas are DERIVED, not copied from an FDA field. A fixed keyword list is run over two real strings: the ClinicalTrials.gov condition query actually executed for this product's modality on the run date, and the device names of the FDA product codes attached to this product's records. The words "skin" and "cosmetic" are ignored because every query contains one of them. An area is not the cleared or approved indication — openFDA's 510(k) response does not carry the indications-for-use text, and this Index does not paraphrase it.
Methodology →
Sources
- openFDA query run for this producthttps://api.fda.gov/device/pma.json?search=trade_name:"PROFHILO"&sort=decision_date:asc&limit=100
- openFDA query run for this producthttps://api.fda.gov/device/510k.json?search=device_name:"PROFHILO"&sort=decision_date:desc&limit=100
- openFDA query run for this producthttps://api.fda.gov/device/pma.json?search=applicant:"IBSA"&sort=decision_date:asc&limit=20
- openFDA query run for this producthttps://api.fda.gov/device/510k.json?search=applicant:"IBSA"&sort=decision_date:desc&limit=20
- PubMed count, all timehttps://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/esearch.fcgi?db=pubmed&retmode=json&rettype=count&term=%28%22hyaluronic%20acid%20filler%22%5Btiab%5D%20OR%20%22hyaluronic%20acid%20dermal%20filler%22%5Btiab%5D%20OR%20%28%22hyaluronic%20acid%22%5Btiab%5D%20AND%20%28%22dermal%20filler%22%5Btiab%5D%20OR%20%22soft%20tissue%20filler%22%5Btiab%5D%20OR%20%22nasolabial%22%5Btiab%5D%20OR%20%22lip%20augmentation%22%5Btiab%5D%20OR%20%22midface%22%5Btiab%5D%29%29%29%20AND%20%28aesthetic%5Btiab%5D%20OR%20cosmetic%5Btiab%5D%20OR%20facial%5Btiab%5D%20OR%20skin%5Btiab%5D%20OR%20volume%5Btiab%5D%29
- PubMed count, last 10 yearshttps://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/esearch.fcgi?db=pubmed&retmode=json&rettype=count&term=%28%22hyaluronic%20acid%20filler%22%5Btiab%5D%20OR%20%22hyaluronic%20acid%20dermal%20filler%22%5Btiab%5D%20OR%20%28%22hyaluronic%20acid%22%5Btiab%5D%20AND%20%28%22dermal%20filler%22%5Btiab%5D%20OR%20%22soft%20tissue%20filler%22%5Btiab%5D%20OR%20%22nasolabial%22%5Btiab%5D%20OR%20%22lip%20augmentation%22%5Btiab%5D%20OR%20%22midface%22%5Btiab%5D%29%29%29%20AND%20%28aesthetic%5Btiab%5D%20OR%20cosmetic%5Btiab%5D%20OR%20facial%5Btiab%5D%20OR%20skin%5Btiab%5D%20OR%20volume%5Btiab%5D%29%20AND%20%28%222016%2F01%2F01%22%5Bdp%5D%20%3A%20%222026%2F12%2F31%22%5Bdp%5D%29
- ClinicalTrials.gov, all studieshttps://clinicaltrials.gov/api/v2/studies?query.intr=%28%22hyaluronic%20acid%20filler%22%20OR%20%22hyaluronic%20acid%20dermal%20filler%22%20OR%20%22HA%20filler%22%29&query.cond=%28%22nasolabial%20folds%22%20OR%20%22facial%20wrinkles%22%20OR%20%22lip%20augmentation%22%20OR%20%22volume%20deficit%22%20OR%20cosmetic%29&countTotal=true&pageSize=1&fields=NCTId
- ClinicalTrials.gov, recruiting onlyhttps://clinicaltrials.gov/api/v2/studies?query.intr=%28%22hyaluronic%20acid%20filler%22%20OR%20%22hyaluronic%20acid%20dermal%20filler%22%20OR%20%22HA%20filler%22%29&query.cond=%28%22nasolabial%20folds%22%20OR%20%22facial%20wrinkles%22%20OR%20%22lip%20augmentation%22%20OR%20%22volume%20deficit%22%20OR%20cosmetic%29&filter.overallStatus=RECRUITING&countTotal=true&pageSize=1&fields=NCTId
No adverse-event data is published anywhere on this site. What this measuresNo adverse-event data appears anywhere on this site. MAUDE and FAERS were never queried: those counts have no denominator, reporting is voluntary and duplicated, and a report is not evidence of causation. Publishing them beside a brand name would mislead.
Methodology →