Who publishes this index, and what they also sell
Free, neutral index of FDA-cleared aesthetic devices and their published evidence.
Size of this build, not the market. What this measuresThese four counts describe the size of this index on the day it was last built: how many products have a card, how many FDA 510(k) decisions fell inside the fetch window for the curated product codes, how many treatment modalities have a version-pinned literature query, and how many product codes that allowlist contains. They are not a count of every aesthetic device on the market, not a count of every clearance FDA issued, and not a measure of how good or how popular anything is.
Methodology →
What this is
- Cost
- Free. No account, paywall, ads or paid placement.
- Sources
- openFDA, PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov. Every figure links back.
- Unknowns
- Shown as —, never estimated.
- FDA wording
- 510(k) = cleared. PMA/BLA/NDA = approved.
- Not here
- Adverse-event data, safety scores, sales. Not medical advice.
Who runs it
- Editor
- Damini Rijhwani, solo founder (LinkedIn)
- Also builds
- Dalphene, a practice-management platform for med spas. No manufacturer pays for a listing or a ranking.
- Publisher
- Automation Core, Inc.
- Data built
- 25 Jul 2026
Corrections
- damini@automationcoreinc.com
- Include
- Page URL, the wrong figure, and its source record (K-number, PMID, NCT) if you have one.
- Reply
- Within three business days.
Known gaps
- Halo: no confident 510(k) match; regulatory fields null
- Emsculpt NEO: no confident 510(k) match; regulatory fields null
- HydraFacial: no confident 510(k) match; regulatory fields null
Published as —, not guessed. What this measuresThese are the values this build could not resolve to a source record, so they are published as em-dashes rather than filled in. If you can point at the right FDA record for any of them, that is the single most useful correction you could send.
Methodology →