Accure Acne, Inc.
TRI-BEAM — FDA clearance record and published evidence
Jeisys Medical Incorporated · Lasers & Light
Methodology →510(k) · cleared
Methodology →1
Methodology →—
Methodology →—
A 510(k) device is cleared, not approved — a different route, not a lesser one. What this measuresA 510(k) clearance means FDA agreed the device is substantially equivalent to a device already legally on the market. It is a clearance, not an approval: it is not a finding that the device is effective, and not a comparison against any other product. It measures how much has been published about a technique. It is not a quality score, not an efficacy measure, not a count of randomised trials, and not comparable between modalities of different ages. It says nothing about this brand specifically.
Methodology →
Overview
- Modality
- —
- Manufacturer
- Jeisys Medical Incorporated
- Category
- Lasers & Light
- Latest decision
- FDA records
- 1
- Mapping
- Verified
Mapping is the weakest link on this page; the rule is published. What this measuresMatched 1 openFDA 510(k) record(s) whose device_name contains 'tri-beam' and whose applicant contains 'Jeisys'. Every K-number, product code and date below is copied verbatim from that API response; none is inferred. modality left null: Q-switched nanosecond, same reason as RevLite. A mapping is the weakest link on this page: if it is wrong, every number above it is about the wrong product. It is stated in full so it can be checked.
Methodology →
Regulatory
| Identifier | Type | Role | FDA record |
|---|---|---|---|
| K251464 | 510(k) — cleared | Primary | Open → |
| Code | FDA device name | 21 CFR |
|---|---|---|
| GEX | Powered Laser Surgical Instrument | 878.4810 |
Cleared indication: not transcribed here — read it on K251464 → Cleared indicationopenFDA's release of this database does not return the indications-for-use text, and this Index will not paraphrase a regulatory statement it has not transcribed. A 510(k) clearance means FDA agreed the device is substantially equivalent to a device already legally on the market. It is a clearance, not an approval: it is not a finding that the device is effective, and not a comparison against any other product.
Methodology →
Evidence
No modality is assigned to this product, so no literature or trial counts are shown.
Treatment areas
No treatment area could be derived: neither the modality's condition query nor the FDA product codes contained a term on the keyword list.
Sources
- openFDA query run for this producthttps://api.fda.gov/device/510k.json?search=device_name%3A%22TRI-BEAM%22&sort=decision_date%3Adesc&limit=100
- openFDA classification record for product code GEXhttps://api.fda.gov/device/classification.json?search=product_code:%22GEX%22&limit=1
- FDA public record for K251464https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfPMN/pmn.cfm?ID=K251464
No adverse-event data is published anywhere on this site. What this measuresNo adverse-event data appears anywhere on this site. MAUDE and FAERS were never queried: those counts have no denominator, reporting is voluntary and duplicated, and a report is not evidence of causation. Publishing them beside a brand name would mislead.
Methodology →