Dalphene Index

Emsculpt NEO — no FDA record matched to this brand name

Maker · Body Contouring · High-intensity electromagnetic muscle stimulation

Unverified mapping
Pathway
Class
First decision
Years on market
Studies61
Trials4

No FDA record matched this brand, so nothing regulatory is claimed here.

Compare with similar CoolTone NuEra Tight Accent Compare all 4 →

Shares treatment areas — not a recommendation.

Overview

ModalityModalityA family of treatments that work the same way — such as radiofrequency microneedling, or lasers that leave the skin surface intact — rather than any one branded machine.
High-intensity electromagnetic muscle stimulation
Manufacturer
Category
Body Contouring
Latest decision
FDA records
MappingCrosswalkThe mapping this site keeps between records that no single source links up, such as tying a brand name to the FDA codes and the study searches that describe the same thing.
Not verified

Mapping is the weakest link on this page; the rule is published.

Regulatory

Unverified mapping

No clearance number, approval number, device class, manufacturer or date is shown for this product. Nothing is guessed to fill the gap.

Indication: none shown, because no FDA record was matched to this brand name.

Evidence

Counted for the modality, never the brand.

61PubMed, all time
61PubMed, 10y
4Studies
0Recruiting
High-intensity electromagnetic muscle stimulation — PubMed records per year, 2016–2026 (2026 partial)
High-intensity electromagnetic muscle stimulation
20160
20170
20184
20196
20208
202114
20229
202314
20248
20255
20264
5papers · 2025 · modality, not brand−38%

PubMed counts publications; ClinicalTrials.gov counts registrations. Neither is a quality score.

What that literature is made of

By publication type · all years

All records on this querythe set every row below is drawn from61
Systematic review / meta-analysis3.3% of the total2
Randomised controlled trial4.9% of the total3
Clinical trial (any type)11.5% of the total7
Review11.5% of the total7
Case report8.2% of the total5
High-intensity electromagnetic muscle stimulation — PubMed records by publication type, all years
PubMed records
All records on this query61
Systematic review / meta-analysis2
Randomised controlled trial3
Clinical trial (any type)7
Review7
Case report5

Each row is one publication typePublication typeThe label the literature index attaches to a paper to say what kind of work it is, which is assigned by the index rather than by this site., and the rows overlap: PubMed explodes Clinical trial, so it already contains the randomised trials, and the systematic-review subset intersects Review. They do not sum to the total. Bar length is the count against this modality's own query total; rows are in the order the source file defines them, not by size.

What each modality's PubMed total is made of, by publication type. Counting study types is not a quality assessment.

PubMed query, verbatim

("high-intensity focused electromagnetic"[tiab] OR "HIFEM"[tiab] OR "high intensity focused electromagnetic"[tiab] OR ("electromagnetic"[tiab] AND "muscle stimulation"[tiab] AND "body contouring"[tiab])) AND (muscle*[tiab] OR abdomen[tiab] OR buttock*[tiab] OR "body contouring"[tiab] OR fat[tiab])

Run it →

ClinicalTrials.gov query, verbatim

intervention: ("HIFEM" OR "high intensity focused electromagnetic" OR "electromagnetic muscle stimulation") condition: ("body contouring" OR "muscle strengthening" OR "abdominal fat" OR cosmetic OR "body composition")

Run it →

Treatment areas

What matched, and where
AreaMatched termSource string
Fat & body contouringbody contouringClinicalTrials.gov condition query for High-intensity electromagnetic muscle stimulation
Muscle stimulationmuscle strengtheningClinicalTrials.gov condition query for High-intensity electromagnetic muscle stimulation

Derived by keyword rule, not the cleared or approved indication.

Sources

No adverse-event data is published anywhere on this site.